You're spending $99/month on Expandi. Your campaigns run. Connection requests go out. Messages get sent.

But here's the question nobody wants to ask: how many meetings are you actually booking?

If you're reading this ReactIn vs Expandi comparison 2026 Guide, you've probably noticed something. The volume is there. The activity looks good in dashboards. But the results? They're not matching the effort.

This isn't a "which tool has more features" article. This is an honest breakdown of what actually drives LinkedIn ROI in 2026. And spoiler: it's not about sending more messages.

Let's dig in 🎯

The Real Problem With Volume-Based LinkedIn Automation

Here's what most LinkedIn automation tools get wrong.

They optimize for activity, not results.

Expandi, like most tools in the market, is built around a simple premise: more outreach = more responses. Set up your sequence, define your audience, blast 300+ connection requests per week, and hope the numbers work out.

The math sounds reasonable.

If you send 1,000 messages and get a 3% reply rate, you get 30 conversations. Scale that up, and eventually you hit your quota.

But here's what this approach misses:

Cold outreach to strangers is fundamentally different from reaching people who already showed interest.

Think about it. When someone engages with a competitor's post, attends an industry webinar, or visits your profile, they're signaling something. They're curious. They're researching. They're in buying mode.

That signal is worth 10x more than a random Sales Navigator filter. Check the LinkedIn Sales Blog here to learn more.

And this is where the ReactIn vs Expandi comparison 2026 gets interesting. These 2 tools approach LinkedIn automation from completely different angles.

ReactIn vs Expandi Comparison 2026: Core Philosophy

Let me be direct about what separates these two tools.

Expandi is a volume-based automation platform. It helps you send more messages, faster, with personalization and safety features. It's good at what it does. The sequences work. The warm-up features protect your account. The UI is clean.

ReactIn is an intent-based automation platform. Instead of starting with "who should I reach out to?", it starts with "who is already interested in what I sell?"

Same LinkedIn. Completely different game.

Here's how this plays out in practice:

The difference isn't subtle. It's fundamental.

Feature Breakdown: What Each Tool Actually Does

Expandi Features

Expandi has built a solid LinkedIn automation platform. Credit where it's due. Here's what you get:

Automation capabilities:

• Connection requests with personalized notes

• Follow-up message sequences (up to 10 steps)

• Profile visits and endorsements

• InMail campaigns

• Event invitations

• Email integration for multichannel sequences

Safety features:

• Cloud-based (runs without your browser)

• Dedicated IP address per account

• Auto warm-up for new accounts

• Smart daily limits

• Human-like delays between actions

Personalization:

• Dynamic text variables (first name, company, etc.)

• Hyperise integration for images and GIFs (paid add-on)

• A/B testing for message variants

Integrations:

• Zapier and webhooks

• Pipedrive

• HubSpot (via Zapier)

For volume-based outreach, Expandi delivers. The sequences run reliably. The safety features work. If your strategy is "send lots of messages and see what sticks," Expandi executes that strategy well.

All the reviews here.

ReactIn Features

ReactIn approaches LinkedIn automation differently. Instead of "send more," it's built around "reach the right people at the right time."

Intent-based targeting (SmartLists):

• LinkedIn Spyer: Track who engages with competitor content

• LinkedIn Pixel: Capture everyone who engages with your posts

• Profile Visitors: Auto-outreach to people who viewed your profile

• Webinar Attendees: Track and follow up with event participants

• Cal.com & Tally.so: Trigger campaigns from bookings and form submissions

• Received Connections: Auto-accept and message new connections

Dynamic lists that update automatically:

• SmartLists aren't static CSVs. They update in real-time as new people match your criteria.

• Does someone engage with a competitor's post? They're automatically added to your campaign.

• This is intent-based targeting at scale.

Automation capabilities:

• Connection requests with context-aware messaging

• Multi-step sequences

• Conditional logic based on responses

• Unified inbox for managing conversations

Safety features:

• Cloud-based automation

• Account warm-up protocols

• Activity limits within LinkedIn guidelines

• Natural behavior simulation

Native integrations:

• Cal.com (bookings and no-shows)

• Tally.so (form submissions)

• Webhooks, API, Zapier, Make, n8n

The key difference: ReactIn captures behavioral signals and turns them into automated campaigns. You're not guessing who might be interested. You're reaching people who already showed they are.

ReactIn vs Expandi Comparison 2026: Pricing Breakdown

Let's talk money. Because ROI isn't just about results. It's about results per dollar spent.

Expandi Pricing (2026)

Expandi uses simple pricing. One plan, all features included, per LinkedIn account. If you manage 5 accounts, that's $495/month. Ten accounts? $990/month.

The annual commitment saves roughly 20% ($950/year vs $1,188/year monthly).

What's included:

• Unlimited campaigns

• All automation features

• Dedicated IP

• A/B testing

• Analytics

What costs extra:

• Hyperise integration (personalized images)

• Additional LinkedIn accounts

ReactIn Pricing (2026)

ReactIn prices per sender (LinkedIn account), not per user. Both plans include 1,000 enrichment credits and unlimited actions within LinkedIn's safety limits.

The agency math is important:

• 10 accounts on Expandi: $990/month

• 10 accounts on ReactIn Growth: $690/month (30% less)

• 50 accounts on Expandi: ~$4,000+/month (estimated with volume discount)

• 50 accounts on ReactIn Agency: $1,000/month (75% less)

At scale, the cost difference is significant.

The ROI Question: What Actually Matters

Here's where this ReactIn vs Expandi comparison 2026 gets real.

Features and pricing are inputs. Meetings booked is the output that matters.

Let me walk through a realistic scenario:

Scenario: SDR Team Running LinkedIn Outreach

Assumptions:

• 1 LinkedIn account

• 200 connection requests per week

• Goal: book qualified meetings

Expandi approach (volume-based):

• Target: Sales Navigator list of 10,000 prospects

• Connection acceptance rate: 15-25%

• Reply rate to follow-up: 5-10%

• Meeting conversion: 10% of positive replies

Math:

• 200 connections/week × 20% acceptance = 40 new connections

• 40 connections × 7% reply rate = ~3 positive replies

• 3 replies × 10% meeting rate = 0.3 meetings/week

Monthly result: ~1-2 meetings Cost per meeting: $50-99

ReactIn approach (intent-based):

• Target: People who engaged with competitor posts, visited your profile, attended relevant webinars

• Connection acceptance rate: 45-60%

• Reply rate to follow-up: 25-40%

• Meeting conversion: 15% of positive replies

27% average reply rate across 5,000+ user campaigns (2026 study)

Math:

• 200 connections/week × 55% acceptance = 110 new connections

• 110 connections × 30% reply rate = 33 positive replies

• 33 replies × 15% meeting rate = 5 meetings/week

Monthly result: ~20 meetings Cost per meeting: ~$3.50

The difference isn't 10% better. It's 10x better.

Why? Because you're reaching people at the moment they're interested, not when your campaign schedule says so.

When Expandi Makes Sense

I'm not going to pretend ReactIn is right for everyone. Expandi is a legitimate tool with real use cases.

Choose Expandi if:

1. You need email sequences. Expandi combines LinkedIn and email in one workflow. If multichannel cadences are essential, this integration matters.

2. You prefer one-price simplicity. $99/month, all features, no decisions. Some teams value this predictability.

3. Your volume strategy already works. If you've optimized cold outreach and you're hitting targets, don't fix what's not broken.

4. You want built-in image personalization. The Hyperise integration lets you add personalized images and GIFs. It's a paid add-on, but it's native.

Expandi is a professional tool. It does what it promises. The question is whether volume-based outreach is the right strategy for your market.

When ReactIn Makes Sense

Choose ReactIn if:

1. Quality over quantity matters. If you're selling high-ticket B2B, one great conversation beats 100 ignored messages.

2. You want to capture intent signals. LinkedIn Spyer for competitor audiences. LinkedIn Pixel for your own content. Profile visitors. Webinar attendees. These signals exist. ReactIn captures them automatically.

3. You're running events or content marketing. If you're creating content, hosting webinars, or speaking at events, ReactIn turns that activity into automated follow-up.

4. You manage multiple accounts. The Agency plan at $1,000/month for 50 accounts is dramatically cheaper than competitors at scale.

5. You want native integrations with Cal.com and Tally.so. Trigger LinkedIn campaigns from calendar bookings, no-shows, or form submissions. No Zapier required.

The core advantage: you're reaching people who already raised their hand, not hoping random outreach lands.

Safety: How Both Tools Protect Your Account

LinkedIn restrictions are real. Both tools take safety seriously.

Expandi Safety

• Cloud-based (doesn't run in your browser)

• Dedicated IP address per account

• Auto warm-up for new accounts

• Configurable daily limits

• Human-like delays between actions

• Mimics natural LinkedIn behavior patterns

Expandi has a strong reputation for account safety. They've been in the market since 2019 and understand LinkedIn's detection patterns.

ReactIn Safety

• Cloud-based automation

• Account warm-up protocols

• Activity limits within LinkedIn guidelines

• Natural behavior simulation

• Intent-based targeting is inherently safer (responses are expected)

Here's an often-overlooked safety advantage of intent-based outreach: when you reach people who showed interest, they respond positively more often.

LinkedIn's algorithms notice when your messages get ignored, deleted, or marked as spam. High positive response rates signal to LinkedIn that your outreach is welcome. This creates a virtuous cycle where intent-based campaigns naturally stay safer than cold volume campaigns.

Real Talk: What Users Say

Expandi Feedback (from G2 reviews)

Positive:

• "Easy to use with ready-made templates"

• "Rarely has bugs or downtime"

• "Customer service is excellent"

• "Great for automating LinkedIn growth"

Negative:

• "Dashboard features need improvement"

• "Integration capabilities lacking"

• "A bit pricey compared to competitors"

• "Takes time to start getting results"

ReactIn Positioning

ReactIn is newer to the market and optimized for a different use case. The feedback from users consistently highlights:

• Higher reply rates from intent-based targeting

• Simpler setup with SmartList templates

• Cost-effective agency pricing

• Native Cal.com and Tally.so integrations

The fundamental difference in user experience comes from targeting. When you reach interested people, the entire workflow feels easier because prospects actually want to talk.

Conclusion

This ReactIn vs Expandi comparison 2026 comes down to one question:

Do you believe in volume or intent?

Expandi is a well-built tool for volume-based LinkedIn automation. It sends messages reliably, keeps your account safe, and provides solid analytics. If your strategy is "more outreach = more results," Expandi executes that strategy well.

ReactIn is built for a different philosophy. Instead of reaching more people, it helps you reach the right people at the right time. Intent signals from competitor engagement, profile visits, webinar attendance, and content interaction create a fundamentally different starting point for conversations.

The ROI math favors intent. Higher acceptance rates, higher reply rates, and more meetings booked per dollar spent.

But don't take my word for it.

Try ReactIn free and set up one intent-based campaign. Track competitor engagers with LinkedIn Spyer. Message your profile visitors. Follow up with webinar attendees.

Compare the response rates to your volume campaigns.

The numbers will tell the story 🤝

Try ReactIn free. No credit card required. 💙

27% average reply rate across 5,000+ user campaigns

François D.
Founder, ReactIn
My LinkedIn profile